Combining Current Tech Could Make Solar Cheaper than Coal

By the end of the decade, manufacturers in the United States could make solar panels that are less than half as expensive as the ones they make now. That would be cheap enough for solar power to compete with electricity from fossil fuels, according to a new study in Energy & Environmental Science. The cost reductions will come via technology that’s already being demonstrated in research labs at startups, universities, and major solar manufacturers, and could involve silicon, the material most solar panels are made from today.

The report, from researchers at MIT led by Tonio Buonassisi, a professor of mechanical engineering and manufacturing, identifies early-stage technologies that, if employed together, could reduce the cost of making solar panels to 52 cents per watt. Currently, the cost is over a dollar per watt. At 52 cents per watt, assuming similar cost reductions for installation and equipment such as inverters, solar power would cost six cents per kilowatt-hour in sunny areas of the U.S.—less than the average cost of electricity in the U.S. today. Solar power in sunny areas now costs roughly 15 cents per kilowatt-hour, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, although the cost can be sharply higher in small installations or in cloudy areas where solar installations generate less electricity.

via Making Solar Power Competitive with Coal – Technology Review.

One thought on “Combining Current Tech Could Make Solar Cheaper than Coal”

  1. In much of the U.S. for much of the year, average cost/kWh is the wrong frame of reference. Power generated in the middle of the night is less costly because it is generated on equipment that operates continuously (base load power). This cheap power masks the cost of peak hour production. The 15 cents per kilowatt-hour of solar is already cheaper in many cases. Better alignment of cost and price, for both producers and consumers, would accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels.

Comments are closed.